Posts Tagged: Yahoo


26
Feb 10

Do paywalls hurt social news?

Today’s post comes from Elena Ziebarth, a new product development associate at SmartBrief. Last week’s paidContent 2010 conference tackled the future of the publishing industry in the digital world.   The New York Times recently announced that they are establishing a metered model for their online properties, where a nonsubscriber would pay a flat fee for a month’s worth of access to its articles and blogs.   A nonsubscriber that reaches an article or blog post via Google search or a link would be allowed a few free views before having to pay for the month’s worth of access. During lunch at last Friday’s event, paidContent’s Staci Kramer interviewed three members of the New York Times’ leadership — Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., chairman and publisher; Janet Robinson, president and CEO; and Martin Nisenholtz, senior vice president of digital operations — on their expectations for the metered model. Nisenholtz said about 60% of New York Times online readers access the site through the homepage — the “front door” — including many heavy readers, or those consuming more than 10 articles per month.  Readers coming through “side doors” such as non-NYT blogs, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. are negligible, and under the proposed metered model, they would have to pay after reaching a certain number of article or blog views, he said. With the recent news of Facebook surpassing Google as the top access point to news portals such as Yahoo! and MSN, you have to wonder if the New York Times metered model will actually work as intended. If traffic to the New York Times online site via “side doors” continues to grow as more and more people depend on their friends’ recommendations in Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites, will the New York Times’ meter hinder the sharing of its articles and blog posts, therefore hurting its potential for ad sales revenue and overall subscriber growth? LeAnn Prescott of VenturaBeat recently panned the New York Times’ plan, writing: “It seems underhanded for any online news site to encourage social-media sharing, but not allow everyone to read the articles.” What’s your take?  Are paywalls and/or meters that control access to news content at complete odds with social media?   Are big media companies such as the New York Times missing an opportunity to increase the number of their loyal readers that could come via social media channels? Image credit, enot-poloskun , via iStock

3c3b757d57button.gif Do paywalls hurt social news?

See the rest here:
Do paywalls hurt social news?


24
Feb 10

Dissecting the Twitter-Yahoo deal

Two weeks ago, I was all excited about Google integrating social media with e-mail. Today, Yahoo! makes a giant stride toward integrating content with social networking and I’m, at best, mildly curious. Web portals such as Yahoo! exist to solve an information-filtering problem. In the early days of the Web, visiting a portal site such as Yahoo! saved you a lot of time, because it meant you didn’t have to visit a bunch of different sites to get all the news and other content you need. But times have changed — now we’ve got all kinds of tools to help keep us in the loop: text and e-mail alerts, RSS feeds, super-cool e-mail newsletters and a plethora of social networks. Each of these platforms does a better job of filtering information than a single, all-purpose portal, because they’re easier to tailor to the things you actually care about. Why take a step back? I’ll admit the move is great for current Yahoo! users — and adding tweets to their search results is a fine idea. Perhaps most importantly, it shows that Yahoo! still has its head in the game and is looking for ways to transform itself. But I’m not sure if this is the move that will convince users like me to give the old portal system another try. Disagree? See a key detail in the arrangement that I’ve missed? Think Yahoo is the best thing ever? Let me know in the comments! Image credit, alexsl , via iStock

3c3b757d57button.gif Dissecting the Twitter Yahoo deal

Read more here:
Dissecting the Twitter-Yahoo deal


17
Feb 10

Basic Tips on Web Analytics

Just about every business with a web site does something to market and promote it. When those companies are asked about web analytics, it’s surprising how many look back with a blank stare.  This isn’t the case with mature online marketers but it does happen a lot with new business web sites and blogs. For many companies that are new to web analytics the idea of digging in and finding useful information can be daunting.  It’s common marketing sense to measure what you’re marketing, but making sense of analytics data doesn’t always find time in the mix of duties a small business or new web site owner is responsible for. The amount of information that analytics packages deliver isn’t always easy to sort through and turn into business decisions. So what should those that are new to web analytics do? Keep it simple and start off with the basics. Each analytics package is different in features, price and learning curve. I’d suggest starting out with Google Analytics as it’s free, feature rich, and not too complicated to learn. Start off by looking at the items below. Unique Visitors – Unique visitors are are an important metric as it counts everyone as one for any given time period. This means that if you had 250 unique visitors, 250 different people visited your site at least once. If your unique visitor number is low, it could mean that your site is either having issues in search engines, or need more content. Traffic Sources – Are you getting traffic from Google, Yahoo, Twitter, or other sites? Referring information can help you see where your traffic is coming from which you can then use to make decisions on where and how to promote your future content. Referring Keywords – These are the phrases that someone put into a search engine and arrived at your site with. Ideally they’d be keyword phrases that related to your company. If not, then it may be an indication that you’re either not optimized, or optimized for the wrong phrases. Top Content – No matter what size your site is, knowing what pages get the most traffic can help you when building out new pages. Using the same format, or building out content on that topic, can help drive more traffic. These are also pages that call to action (CTA) buttons should be added if you want your visitors to do download a white paper or do something specific. Location – If your business wants a strong local presence, the location area in analytics can tell you country, state and city of where your visitors are coming from. Are your visitors actually local? That’d be a good thing to know. Campaign Tracking –  Track visitors from sources where you are marketing to a particular goal page or conversion. As you feel more comfortable with Google Analytics you can then start to explore other actionable data including conversions, trends and features such as the most often used search terms on your internal search engine. Features like goals, top entrance/exit pages, bounce rates, and time on site are also a good metrics to use in understanding how visitors are interacting with your content. Visit the Google Analytics Help page to find out everything you need to know to make the most out of GA. Web analytics can be overwhelming as there is a lot of information to be analyzed and then decisions that need to be made from that data. Instead of trying to jump in and consume it all, take it one step at a time.


16
Feb 10

3 Reasons PR & Communications Pros Need to Know SEO

The PR industry is in a state of flux with increasing importance on getting into the content and social web business. Consumers are spending more time with digital and social media. Advertising dollars are following. That means less budget to staff newsrooms and reporters, journalists and editors to pitch. Understanding the needs of their “customers’ customer” is essential for PR agencies and communications professionals to remain relevant and productive. “Push PR” is increasingly being complemented by “Pull” tactics – optimization for discovery. Being able to provide value is essential and here are 3 ways a better understanding of SEO can do just that. 1. Fish where the fish are. There were over 14 billion core searches in Dec ( comSore ) vs 285 million who watch TV in a given month ( Nielsen ). Consumers rely on search daily to find news and information. PR and communications types need to understand the consumer search behaviors and preferences (keywords) of their clients as well as the publications they want their clients to be covered by. 2. Journalists rely on search. According to TopRank’s “Journalist Use of Search survey”, 91% of journalists, editors and reporters surveyed use standard search engines such as Google, Yahoo or Bing to do their job. That preference was mirrored by findings in a recently published “ Social Media & Online Usage Study ” (pdf) by George washington University and Cision where 100% of those surveyed use Google to research stories. 3. Optimization is about more than SEO. Search engine optimization, digital asset optimization, social media optimization and even micromedia optimization (ie real time SEO) are buzzwords all representing opportunities for Media Relations and communications professionals to influence discovery by making it easier for various types of search engines to find, index and rank their content. It’s imporant that communications people understand the different search options consumers and the media are using to distribute and consume news. If content can be searched on, it can be optimized. That includes everything from press releases to video to Tweets. Search Engine Optimization or “ SEO ” as an umbrella term is typically concerned with any kind of work that influences any kind of search engine to do what it does best and hopefully in favor of the content being promoted. Most people mean optimizing content for better visibility in Google, Yahoo or Bing when they employ SEO tactics. It’s important to note that many publishers are already using SEO tactics to make their news stories better suited for discovery and ranking on search engines. These efforts have resulted in substantial increases in traffic to online news sites, improving the attractiveness of advertising. Digital Asset Optimization or “ DAO ” is a term TopRank has used and promoted since 2007 that makes reference to the different types of media search engines like Google have started to display (aka Blended or Universal search results) depending on the query. Search results are no longer limited to web pages and can include images, video thumbnails, news, blogs, books and local information. Optimizing for these different types of media involves understanding what digital assets can be created, keyword optimized and published online for search. Social Media Optimization or “ SMO ” is a term initially made popular by Rohit Bhargava and added on to by several others in the SEO world including TopRank. While many social networks like Facebook and LinkedIn keep the bulk of their content behind a login and away from search engine spiders, many social interactions produce content that can be indexed and included in search results. Journalists and consumers increasingly participate with social channels to watch, share, contribute and curate information. If PR and communications can understand how to influence keyword use of social content then their news will be easier for analysts, reporters and journalists to find. Here’s a story related to me by an editor in the TopRank Journalist use of search survey that illustrates the intersection of search and social media: “I was writing a column about the planned partnership between Google and Yahoo.” “I tracked down potential sources first using Google and LinkedIn, and came across a white paper prepared by a senior fellow at the American Antitrust Institute.” “While I could not easily find an e-mail address, I went to Facebook where I located him, then sent a message. He replied and we followed up with a phone interview.” Micromedia Optimization is a new term that basically means real time optimization of status updates and content sources that are indexed and included as real time content by search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Bing. The same micromedia content can be shared and discovered on platform specific search engines such as search.twitter.com and across social networks that provide the opportunity to syndicate such content. Google Buzz, Facebook status updates and LinkedIn updates are also included in this category. The takeaway that I think is most important for communications professionals is to understand the nature of search and how to match up optimization tactics with channels of disccovery. Using keyword research for both standard search and social search optimization of news content along with ongoing web analytics and social media monitoring are key. I’ll be discussing these strategies, tactics and a lot more at SMC Louisville tonight 6:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. ET on at the Louisville Visual Art Association. I hope folks can brave the snow (safely) and make it out. You won’t be disappointed!


21
Jan 10

Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense

duplicate content Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your ExpenseDid you realize that search engines have gone full circle on URLs in variables? It used to be considered something to avoid, now search engines are saying variables in URLs are good, as long as you use the canonical meta tag. Google is pushing them with FeedBurner and if webmasters aren’t careful, they could fall victim to a new onslaught of duplicate content issues.

One of the biggest issues with SEO is duplicate content. If search engines can’t tell which version of a document is the original or canonical version, then there can be consequences involving less than ideal search visibility. For example, the following URLs might all point to the same web page, creating the illusion that they are copies of the same thing. But in reality, it’s just one web page.

www.domainname.com
domainname.com
www.domainname.com/index.html
www.domainname.com/index.html?referid=somesitethatyouareadvertisingon

Content management systems, e-commerce stores, and dynamic sites in general, used to be big on adding variables to URLs as a way to construct search queries on content or to track visitors. Then along came advice from the search engines that said they see each URL as a unique if it has different variables. That little improvement caused a duplicate content mess.

So over the past few years, web site owners and marketers have been hard at work cleaning up their URLs, removing variables and trying to make duplicate content a thing of the past.

Then Google came out with a canonical meta tag that could be used to help fix duplicate content issues. The advice was to simply add a canonical meta tag to any page and every version of that page will be considered one. No longer will there be duplicate versions and no longer will variables be a problem in creating the illusion of different copies of the same page.

The good news here is that Yahoo, Bing, and Ask also jumped on board to support the canonical meta tag.

What we didn’t realize was Google had a hidden agenda. (In my opinion) For a few months after the canonical meta tag came out, Google FeedBurner started populating every feed that runs though their service with additional variables in the URL. These variables are then used to better track FeedBurner clicks in Google Analytics.

So now, Google is pushing out URLs with multiple variables creating duplicate content issues for anyone who isn’t using the canonical meta tag. Additionally, if you use TwitterFeed to auto post content from FeedBurner to Twitter, or even copy the URL from a feed and share it, you’re also spreading the problem.

Google then came out with a URL builder tool that allowed you to track custom campaigns in Google Analytics by customizing your URLs with additional tracking variables. This extends the potential duplicate content issue even further.

So what doess this all mean for web site owners and marketers? It means that if you’re not paying attention, duplicate content could be causing you problems with increasing frequency. Do you know if your site has canonical meta tags? It should. Do you know if your FeedBurner feed is going out with additional tracking variables? It probably is.

A Solution: What needs to happen is the canonical meta tag should become a standard meta tag in web development. It should be added to all web pages as a safety measure. It doesn’t harm anything, unless implemented improperly, so ask your developers to code it into all pages.

As for variables in the URL, they’re still not good when it comes to SEO and avoiding duplicate content issues. Short and sweet is the best way to create URLs, but on that off chance that you need to track affiliates, want to track visits to a page from a specific online or offline campaign, or for whatever reason can’t avoid variables in the URL, then they are OK as long as you use the canonical meta tag.

Like it or not, the canonical meta tag is the only way to ensure that your site doesn’t fall victim to duplicate content issues. If you stop and think about it, it is an easy solution to a big problem. And once a site has canonical meta tags on their site, using the URL builder or variables in general to track URLs can be pretty handy. Webmasters just need to remember that a variable or two may be ok for some campaigns, but we don’t want to go back to long and ugly URLs because the longer the URL, the more difficult they’ll be for search engines, and users, to interact with.

delicious big Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense
stumble big Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense
google bookmark big Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense
facebook icon Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense
twitter Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense
            feed big Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense Subscribe to this Feed

© Online Marketing Blog, 2010. |
Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense |
20 comments | http://www.toprankblog.com

 Search Engines Bringing Back Variables In URLs – At Your Expense